top of page
Untitled design(33).png

Confirmed Judges, Confirmed Fears

Trump's judges are taking a sledgehammer to our rights and freedoms. Use this tool to see the total impact.

The Latest

Stopping Musk deposition

In re Elon Musk

Website Action images(2).png
CJCF Images.png
Preventing findings on abusive immigration actions

Chicago Headline Club v Noem

CJCF Images(1).png
Reversing gun possession conviction
pexels-karolina-grabowska-5202395(1).jpg

We can't let this be the new normal.

Confirmed Judges Confirmed Fears tracks the damaging impacts of Trump-appointed judges around the country, and chronicles the decisions that hurt all of us.

Website Action images(2).png

Reverses gun possession conviction

US v Wendt

The police chief of a small Iowa town challenged his conviction for possession of a machine gun in his private capacity for use in his private business.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Stopping Musk deposition

In re Elon Musk

Elon Musk and the Trump Administration sought to stop any depositions of Musk and others about the Administration’s foreign aid cuts and dismantling of USAID.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Preventing findings on abusive immigration enforcement

Chicago Headline Club v Noem

The Trump Administration sought to prevent court findings about abusive tactics used by immigration authorities from being used against it in the future.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Stopping law protecting trans teens

Mirabelli v Bonta

A number of parents and teachers challenged a California law that protects students’ privacy by keeping private gender transitioning efforts by students if they wish and by requiring teachers to cooperate in such efforts.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Stripping federal workers of rights

AFGE v Trump

Unions have challenged a Trump Executive Order that takes away collective bargaining rights from many federal workers

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Ridiculing immigration decision

Rojasespinoza v Bondi

The Ninth Circuit was asked to reconsider a decision letting the government deport a Peruvian family.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Allowing ten commandments in school

Roake v. Brumley

Louisianans challenged a state law forcing public schools to prominently display the Ten Commandments in all classrooms.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Excluding HIV positive people from service

Wilkins v Hegseth

The US military has a policy that excludes people with HIV from serving or enlisting in the military, even if they are totally asymptomatic and undetectable. A number of individuals excluded by the policy along with a veterans’ group sued the military.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Disregarding evidence in immigration case

Vilchis-Gomez v Bondi

Immigration authorities detained Alejandro Vilchis-Gomez, who was born in Mexico, and decided to deport him. He is married with three children who were born in the US, and after the initial deportation ruling, Vilchis submitted new evidence that his deportation would cause “increased and intense psychological hardship” to his six year-old son

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Removing right to immigration bond hearings

Buenrostro-Mendez v. Bondi

The Trump administration claims the power to detain millions of noncitizens without bond, including ones who have been here for decades. The vast majority of courts have rejected this extreme reinterpretation of immigration law contrary to congressional statute. But thanks to Trump Judge Kyle Duncan, the government now has that power throughout the Fifth Circuit.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Vacating firearms conviction

US v Ledvina

An illegal drug user claimed that a federal law making it unlawful for him to possess firearms was unconstitutional and contested his conviction for that offense.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Dismissing treatment of mentally ill

South Carolina State Conf of the NAACP v South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice

Disability Rights South Carolina (DRSC) and two other groups sued the state, seeking injunctive relief to remedy deplorable conditions for mentally ill juveniles in facilities of the state’s Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ).

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Excusing officer for killing driver

Hughes v Locure

The family of a driver who was killed by a drunk police officer driving recklessly brought suit against the officer. He claimed he was protected from liability by qualified immunity.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Stopping protester protections

Tincher v Noem

A district judge had restricted ICE from actions abusing witnesses, bystanders and protest participants in Minnesota. The Justice Department went to an 8th Circuit panel to try to lift those restrictions.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Upholding elimination of immigrant grant program

Solutions in Hometown Connections v Noem

Pursuant to an order from Trump in early 2025, DHS froze and then terminated funding to groups authorized by Congress to help new immigrants to the US. A Maryland district court denied groups’ motion for an injunction to stop DHS’ dismantling of the program. The groups appealed to the Fourth Circuit, where Trump judge Allison Rushing and George HW Bush judge Paul Niemeyer affirmed the court below.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Preventing release of immigrant activist

Khalil v President

The federal government is seeking to deport an immigrant who is a permanent legal resident and an advocate for Palestinian rights.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Limit consumer protection act

Howard v RNC

A consumer filed a class action against the RNC for unwanted sending of text messages containing video files, which he contended was in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Dismissing racial discrimination claim

Yubo Miao v United Airlines

An airline passenger, who is a US citizen of Chinese descent, filed a lawsuit against an airline for kicking him off a plane because of his race.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Denying FMLA argument

Spatafore v City of Clarksburg

The city of Clarksburg, West Virginia fired Dominique Spatafore some three months after returning from medical leave. The city claimed it was because she had sent workplace complaints to the mayor’s wife and city council instead of to her supervisor. She filed suit, claiming that she was improperly retaliated against for taking leave, which is illegal under the FMLA. The district court rejected her case, maintaining that there was no evidence that her firing was pretextual and in violation of the FMLA.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Dismissing false arrest claim

Brogsdale v Torres-Corona

An off-duty police officer filed a false arrest complaint against two other officers for arresting him for battery because they knew or should have known he acted in self-defense.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Striking down open carry law

Baird v Bonta

Gun owner Mark Baird filed a federal court challenge to a California state law that bans the open carry of firearms in large urban counties. The district court found in favor of the state, but a panel including two Trump judges, Lawrence VanDyke and Kenneth Lee, reversed and struck down the open carry law.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Allowing protest of equity training

Henderson v Springfield R-12 School District

The Springfield Missouri School District began mandatory equity training programs for teachers and other employees dealing with racism and other issues. Two employees filed suit, claiming that requiring their participation in the program violated First Amendment and other constitutional rights.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Blocking relief from deportation

Romero v Bondi

El Salvador citizen sought relief from deportation due to violation of Convention Against Torture (CAT).

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Dismissing case of police misconduct

Miller v City of Philadelphia

Philadelphia residents sued police for bursting into and searching their home without probable cause.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Granting qualified immunity to prison guard

Gantt v Everett

A prison guard was sued for deliberate indifference for remotely unlocking cell of prisoner on suicide watch

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

© People for the American Way

bottom of page