top of page
Untitled design(33).png

Confirmed Judges, Confirmed Fears

Trump's judges are taking a sledgehammer to our rights and freedoms. Use this tool to see the total impact.

The Latest

Striking down law requiring banks to pay interest

Cantero v Bank of America

pexels-energepic-com-27411-2988232.jpg
CJCF Images.png
Reversing order to bargain

Kerwin v Trinity Health  Grand Haven Hospital.

pexels-chevanon-1108101.jpg
Allowing Alabama to eliminate Black district

Allen v Caster

CJCF Images.png

We can't let this be the new normal.

Confirmed Judges Confirmed Fears tracks the damaging impacts of Trump-appointed judges around the country, and chronicles the decisions that hurt all of us.

Website Action images(2).png

Striking down law requiring banks to pay interest

Cantero v Bank of America

Bank customers sought to collect 2% interest on their mortgage escrow accounts as required by state law.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Reversing injunction ordering union bargaining

Kerwin v Trinity Health Grand Haven Hospital

A hospital wanted to stop bargaining with a union concerning employee rights.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Allowing Alabama to eliminate Black district

Allen v Caster

Alabama went to the Supreme Court to eliminate lower court orders calling for a second majority-black district in light of prior intentional discrimination.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Allowing retailer to avoid arbitration

Bernal v Kohl’s

A large retailer attempted to avoid arbitration of a dispute about deceptive practices.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Dismissing lawsuit against polluting agencies

Forward v Macomber

The owner of a California landfill sued several state agencies for allegedly generating hazardous waste harming its property, in violation of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The case was appealed to the Ninth Circuit.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Refusing review of torture claims

Iris Rodriguez Martinez, et al v. Attorney General United States of America

Iris Ivette Rodriguez Martinez fled from her native El Salvador to the US with her two sons after threats of death from a gang. Immigration agencies declined to grant her any relief, so she went to the Third Circuit.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Banning Mifepristone by mail

Louisiana v. Kennedy

In the years since the MAGA Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, medication abortion care prescribed through telemedicine has become all the more important. In May 2026, Fifth Circuit Trump judges Kyle Duncan and Kurt Engelhardt provided the majority in a panel decision ordering a nationwide halt to the use of telemedicine for mifepristone, the most common abortion care medication.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Supporting right to machine guns

United States v. Wilson

Jamaion Wilson shot someone with a gun that was modified to fire like a machine gun. He was convicted of violating a federal law banning the possession of machine guns. On appeal, he argued that he has a Second Amendment right to own a machine gun.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Stopping challenge to discriminatory redistricting

Abbott v LULAC

Civil rights groups and others challenged a Texas redistricting plan for the 2026 elections as discriminatory.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Demolishing Voting Rights Act

Louisiana v Callais

Louisiana adopted a congressional redistricting plan that created a second majority-minority district to comply with the Voting Rights Act (VRA). A three-judge court ruled the plan unconstitutional, and the case was considered by the Supreme Court.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Stopping class action

Clippinger v State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.

A car accident victim tried to bring a class action against her insurance company for systematically undervaluing the amount that should be paid when a car is totaled. A district court certified the proposed class and the insurance company appealed to the Sixth Circuit.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Keeping Alligator Alcatraz open

Friends of the Everglades,Inc. v. Secretary of Homeland Security

Several environmental groups and an Indian tribe sought to stop the detention of immigrants at, and additional construction of, Alligator Alcatraz, a detention facility in the Florida Everglades.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Letting states post 10 Commandments

Nathan v. Alamo Heights Independent School District

A group of parents challenged a Texas law forcing public schools to prominently display the Ten Commandments in every classroom. With the support of every other Trump judge on the Fifth Circuit, Kyle Duncan wrote a 9-8 opinion upholding the law.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Denying asylum relief

Molina v Bondi; Marquez v Bondi

In two cases in early April, immigrants appealed agency denials of relief from possible torture or other mistreatment if they were deported. The same two judges --- Trump judge Daniel Bress and George W Bush judge Carlos Bea – denied the appeals in both cases

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Blocking contempt proceedings against Trump officials

In re Trump

The Trump Administration sought to stop contempt proceedings by Chief Judge James Boasberg against Trump officials involved in the deportation of Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador last year despite contrary court orders.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Allowing damaging land swap

Arizona Mining Reform Coalition v United States Forest Service

Environmentalists and Indian tribes challenged a land swap under which a copper mining company would obtain and mine specified Arizona land, causing damage to the environment and sacred Indian land.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Failing to consider prisoner's disability claim

Jackson v Dameron

Daniel Jackson, a state prisoner in Virginia, challenged the failure of officials to provide him with effective treatment of leg injuries and pain.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Denying relief to immigrant from possible torture

Esquivel v Bondi

Gonzalo Chavez Esquivel, an immigrant from Mexico, sought relief from deportation along with his family because he contended that he would be tortured if he were sent back to Mexico.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Allowing states to ban books

Penguin Random House v Robbins; Iowa Safe Schools v Reynolds

Book publishers and LGBTQ+ groups challenged an Iowa law that requires removal of books in school libraries that depict or describe any “sex act” and bars teaching related to gender identity or sexual orientation to students below grade 7.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Holding prison officials immune

Pearson v Michigan Dept of Corrections

Four incarcerated women sued Michigan officials for deliberate failure to treat a painful medical condition.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Backing detention of immigrants

Avila v Bondi

A Mexican immigrant challenged the US government for holding him without bond during removal proceedings.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Refusing to make insurance company pay

Hartnett v Jackson National Life Ins. Co.

An elderly woman sued a long-term care insurance company for refusing to cover the cost of home health care that her doctor said was necessary after surgery.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Dismissing challenge to administration of IDEA

DC v Fairfax County School Board

Two parents and an advocacy organization filed a lawsuit challenging the procedures used by a state and school district in implementing the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which governs education of schoolchildren with disabilities.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Dismissing case against police

Bartz v Minneapolis

A police officer wanted the claim against him by a Minneapolis protester shortly after the George Floyd killing dismissed.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Targeting protesters' free speech

Ford v. McKesson

This involves an ongoing effort to hold a Black Lives Matter protest organizer personally responsible for an act of violence against a police officer carried out by an unknown person at the protest. If the effort succeeds, it would deter people from exercising their First Amendment rights to protest against the government.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

© People for the American Way

bottom of page