top of page
Untitled design(33).png

Confirmed Judges, Confirmed Fears

Trump's judges are taking a sledgehammer to our rights and freedoms. Use this tool to see the total impact.

The Latest

Denying asylum relief

Molina v Bondi; Marquez v Bondi

CJCF Images(1).png
CJCF Images.png
Blocking contempt proceedings 

In re Trump

CJCF Images(1).png
Allowing damaging land swap

Arizona Mining Reform Coalition v United States Forest Service.

pexels-samandgos-709552.jpg

We can't let this be the new normal.

Confirmed Judges Confirmed Fears tracks the damaging impacts of Trump-appointed judges around the country, and chronicles the decisions that hurt all of us.

Website Action images(2).png

Denying asylum relief

Molina v Bondi; Marquez v Bondi

In two cases in early April, immigrants appealed agency denials of relief from possible torture or other mistreatment if they were deported. The same two judges --- Trump judge Daniel Bress and George W Bush judge Carlos Bea – denied the appeals in both cases

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Blocking contempt proceedings against Trump officials

In re Trump

The Trump Administration sought to stop contempt proceedings by Chief Judge James Boasberg against Trump officials involved in the deportation of Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador last year despite contrary court orders.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Allowing damaging land swap

Arizona Mining Reform Coalition v United States Forest Service

Environmentalists and Indian tribes challenged a land swap under which a copper mining company would obtain and mine specified Arizona land, causing damage to the environment and sacred Indian land.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Failing to consider prisoner's disability claim

Jackson v Dameron

Daniel Jackson, a state prisoner in Virginia, challenged the failure of officials to provide him with effective treatment of leg injuries and pain.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Denying relief to immigrant from possible torture

Esquivel v Bondi

Gonzalo Chavez Esquivel, an immigrant from Mexico, sought relief from deportation along with his family because he contended that he would be tortured if he were sent back to Mexico.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Allowing states to ban books

Penguin Random House v Robbins; Iowa Safe Schools v Reynolds

Book publishers and LGBTQ+ groups challenged an Iowa law that requires removal of books in school libraries that depict or describe any “sex act” and bars teaching related to gender identity or sexual orientation to students below grade 7.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Holding prison officials immune

Pearson v Michigan Dept of Corrections

Four incarcerated women sued Michigan officials for deliberate failure to treat a painful medical condition.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Backing detention of immigrants

Avila v Bondi

A Mexican immigrant challenged the US government for holding him without bond during removal proceedings.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Refusing to make insurance company pay

Hartnett v Jackson National Life Ins. Co.

An elderly woman sued a long-term care insurance company for refusing to cover the cost of home health care that her doctor said was necessary after surgery.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Dismissing challenge to administration of IDEA

DC v Fairfax County School Board

Two parents and an advocacy organization filed a lawsuit challenging the procedures used by a state and school district in implementing the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which governs education of schoolchildren with disabilities.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Dismissing case against police

Bartz v Minneapolis

A police officer wanted the claim against him by a Minneapolis protester shortly after the George Floyd killing dismissed.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Targeting protesters' free speech

Ford v. McKesson

This involves an ongoing effort to hold a Black Lives Matter protest organizer personally responsible for an act of violence against a police officer carried out by an unknown person at the protest. If the effort succeeds, it would deter people from exercising their First Amendment rights to protest against the government.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Reversing damages awarded to consumer

USAA Savings Bank v Goff

A credit card company challenged an award of punitive damages and attorneys’ fees for cancelling a consumer’s credit card.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Using vulgar language in gender discrimination case

Olympus Spa v. Armstrong

In dissenting in a case concerning discrimination based on gender identity, Trump judge Lawrence VanDyke used harsh and vulgar language that drew widespread criticism across the ideological spectrum.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Reverses gun possession conviction

US v Wendt

The police chief of a small Iowa town challenged his conviction for possession of a machine gun in his private capacity for use in his private business.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Stopping Musk deposition

In re Elon Musk

Elon Musk and the Trump Administration sought to stop any depositions of Musk and others about the Administration’s foreign aid cuts and dismantling of USAID.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Preventing findings on abusive immigration enforcement

Chicago Headline Club v Noem

The Trump Administration sought to prevent court findings about abusive tactics used by immigration authorities from being used against it in the future.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Stopping law protecting trans teens

Mirabelli v Bonta

A number of parents and teachers challenged a California law that protects students’ privacy by keeping private gender transitioning efforts by students if they wish and by requiring teachers to cooperate in such efforts.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Stripping federal workers of rights

AFGE v Trump

Unions have challenged a Trump Executive Order that takes away collective bargaining rights from many federal workers

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Ridiculing immigration decision

Rojasespinoza v Bondi

The Ninth Circuit was asked to reconsider a decision letting the government deport a Peruvian family.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Allowing ten commandments in school

Roake v. Brumley

Louisianans challenged a state law forcing public schools to prominently display the Ten Commandments in all classrooms.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Excluding HIV positive people from service

Wilkins v Hegseth

The US military has a policy that excludes people with HIV from serving or enlisting in the military, even if they are totally asymptomatic and undetectable. A number of individuals excluded by the policy along with a veterans’ group sued the military.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Disregarding evidence in immigration case

Vilchis-Gomez v Bondi

Immigration authorities detained Alejandro Vilchis-Gomez, who was born in Mexico, and decided to deport him. He is married with three children who were born in the US, and after the initial deportation ruling, Vilchis submitted new evidence that his deportation would cause “increased and intense psychological hardship” to his six year-old son

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Removing right to immigration bond hearings

Buenrostro-Mendez v. Bondi

The Trump administration claims the power to detain millions of noncitizens without bond, including ones who have been here for decades. The vast majority of courts have rejected this extreme reinterpretation of immigration law contrary to congressional statute. But thanks to Trump Judge Kyle Duncan, the government now has that power throughout the Fifth Circuit.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

Vacating firearms conviction

US v Ledvina

An illegal drug user claimed that a federal law making it unlawful for him to possess firearms was unconstitutional and contested his conviction for that offense.

 
Issues

Judges

Month decided

Court

Majority/Dissent

Website Action images(2).png

© People for the American Way

bottom of page